1.Art, H.W. and Marks, P.L. 1971. A summary table of biomass and net annual primary production in forest ecosystem of the world In: Forest biomass studies: College of life sciences and Agricultural Experimental station, University of Maine, USA.

2.Birk, E. and Turner, J. 1992. Response of flooded gum (E. grandis) to intensive cultural treatments: biomass and nutrient content of eucalypt plantations and native forests. For. Ecol. Manage., 47: 1–28.

3.Buvaneswaran, C. 2004. Studies on biomass production relations in Tectona grandis L. f plantations at different ages in Tamil Nadu, Ph.D. Thesis, FRI University, Dehara Dun.

4.Davidson, J. 1995.Davidson, J. 1995. Ecological aspects of Eucalypts. In: Proceedings of Regional expert consultation on Eucalyptus. Vol. 1 FAO Regional Office for Asia and Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand. Ecological aspects of Eucalypts. In: Proceedings of Regional expert consultation on Eucalyptus. Vol. 1 FAO Regional Office for Asia and Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand.

5.Dhyani, S.K., Narain, P. and Singh, R.K. 1990. Studies on root distribution of five multipurpose tree species in Doon Valley, India. Agroforestry Systems, 12: 149-161.

6.du Toit, B., Esprey, L.J., Job, R.A., Fuller, G.F. and Dovey, S.D. 2000. Effects of site management in Eucalyptus grandis plantations in South Africa. In: Nambiar, E.K.S., Tiarks, A., Cossalter, C., Ranger, J. (Eds.), Site Management and Productivity in Tropical Plantation Forests: a Progress Report. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia, pp. 21–30.

7.Hunter, I. 2001. Above ground biomass and nutrient uptake of three tree species ( Eucalyptus camaldulensis, E. grandis and Dalbergia sissoo) as affected by irrigation and fertilizer, at 3 years of age, in Southern India. For. Ecol. Manage, 144(1-3): 189-199.

8.Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education. 2010. Frequently asked questions on Eucalyptus. ICFRE Webmail.

9.Jambulingam, R. 1989. Growth and biomass of Casuarina equisetifolia forst. In different ecosystem. Ph. D thesis. Department of Forestry, TNAU, Tamil Nadu.

10.Job, A., du Toit, B. and Esprey, L.J. 2003. Estimating selected input parameters for 3-PG using above-ground biomass data collected from an age series of Eucalyptus grandis in KwaZulu-Natal. South Africa. In: ICFR Bulletin Series 15/2003, Institute for Commercial Forestry Research, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.

11.Judd, T.S. 1996. Simulated nutrient losses due to timber harvesting in highly productive eucalypt forests and plantations. In: Attiwill, P.M., Adams, M.A. (Eds.), Nutrition of Eucalypts. CSIRO Publishing, Australia, pp. 249–258.

12.Karmacharya, S.B. and Singh, K.P. 1992. Biomass and net productivity of teak plantation in dry tropical region of India. For. Ecol. Mgmt., 55(1-4): 233-247.